* indicates a required field
Call for Submissions
2022 AIA Upjohn Research Initiative
Sign in to the Submission Site
Already a User?
Downloadable flyer (PDF)
The AIA Upjohn Research Initiative supports applied research projects that enhance the value of design and professional practice knowledge.
This AIA program funds up to six research grants of $15,000–$30,000 annually for projects completed in a 6- to 18-month period. The funds must be fully matched with hard dollars, with a maximum of 10% allocated for overhead. Grant recipients’ research findings and outcomes are published online by AIA.
You will be using this site to upload your grant proposal and your contact information.
Please login above and follow the instructions to complete your submission.
Research should be relevant and applicable to practicing architects. Upjohn Research grant funding will be allocated to projects related to the priorities outlined in AIA’s Climate Action Plan and AIA’s Strategic Plan. Research projects must address one or more of these areas:
- business case for adaptive/zero-carbon design
- best practices/assessment of climate projects at a community scale
- metrics for equitable, healthy, resilient communities
- effective/successful strategies and/or policies yielding equitable, healthy, resilient communities
- low-carbon materials
- life-cycle analysis
- retrofitting existing structures
- managed retreat
- circular building economy (e.g., materials market)
- temporary and transitional housing models
- project title
- abstract (250 word max; include project concept and brief description of methodology)
- summary of projected outcomes (300 word max; include brief description of how the project aligns with this year's theme)
- clients and knowledge communities served (250 word max)
- approach to collaboration/partnership (250 word max)
- images (optional)
- principal investigator(s) with institutional affiliation(s) and contact information
- contact information for three references
Criteria & Selection
Given their role in helping establish the program, the jury panel is comprised of seven professionals from the AIA Board Knowledge Committee and the AIA College of Fellows.
The jury evaluates submissions and selects the grant awardees based on the following criteria and weighting. Please consider these when preparing your application.
- demonstration that the research enhances the value of design and/or professional practice knowledge (30%)
- innovation (25%)
- evidence of collaboration/partnership (20%)
- validity of research method (15%)
- strength of projected outcomes related to alignment with theme (10%)
Submission deadline: September 1, 2022 by 5pm PT
Notifications to applicants: by November 1, 2022
Verification of matching funds and agreement: by November 21, 2022
Submission fee: None
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Are applicants from outside the United States eligible to apply and receive funding?
A: International applications are eligible to submit; funds for grant recipients will be dispersed in U.S. dollars. Submissions are reviewed in English.
Q: May an applicant submit more than one proposal?
Q: May an applicant be involved in more than one submission?
Q: May an applicant have received funding from the Upjohn grants in previous cycles?
A: Yes. The following are encouraged: New projects, related but distinct previously funded projects, and unfunded projects from prior Upjohn grant applications. The AIA will determine whether a project previously funded through the Upjohn program is eligible.
Q: What are the matching funds requirements?
A: When grant recipients are selected, recipients are required to submit verification/documentation of matching hard-dollar funds as part of the agreement process prior to disbursement of funds. The grant agreement (to be signed by the grant recipient) will have space for noting the dollar amount of matching funds and the source(s). The Match Funds Amount cannot include waiving of/or paying of fringe benefits (i.e., overhead, cost recovery, department administrative support or any other accounting term/principal that implies other than a direct outlay of funds paid to the Grant Recipient).
Q: Would in-kind instrumentation be considered a source of matching funds?
Q: Is there any further guidance on submittals?
These are general feedback points from previous jury cycles. These may or may not apply to your submission.
- Be specific with detail about the project in order to add credibility to the proposal. Detailed project methodologies, metrics, outcomes, and processes will help the project be viewed as well prepared and credible.
- Be clear and substantive about the collaborative aspects of the project. Do not state partners, but on how you would work together and the kind of stakeholders involved/benefiting.
- Be mindful and intentional about how the outcomes relate to the theme, versus modifying the description to fit the theme.
- Avoid unnecessary jargon and acronyms. They can distract from conveying the importance of the work. If acronyms are essential, spell them out in their first occurrence.
- Communicate within the budget section how the how the grant funds would be used to accomplish the intended objectives. Juries are sensitive to budget lines that seem to include overhead.
- Consider and articulate both the immediacy and the longevity of the impact of the work.
- Demonstrate the universality of your proposal.
- If taking place in/on a specific geographical area, be specific as to how it will be applicable to other locations in the U.S. and/or around the world.
- If specific to one building type or sector, note how the project may be applicable to other building types or sectors.